Forums


Broncos owner giving up control due to Alzheimer's.. Rams' Fisher: Sam hasn’t been a distraction.. Spears: Lewis loses deal with Mavs over injury.. Colon perfect for 6 2-3, wins in Seattle.. Sterling testimony ends, wife not called... Niners TE Davis reports to training camp.. Mavs' Felton gets plea deal, avoids jail... Ex-P Kluwe backs off suing Vikings.. Padres OF Maybin suspended 25 games..

SJ Home Forums S. Wedell Memorial Mock Draft Database Arcade Sports Gifts
Go Back   Forums > The Sports Bar > Random Jabber > SJ Military Forum

Notices

SJ Military Forum A forum dedicated to honoring America's military heroes in the Global War on Terrorism and other conflicts in American history. This is NOT a forum to debate pro- or anti-war sentiment.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2013, 05:39 PM   #1
Reveryroadie
Roadie/NFL Swami/Co-Owner
HOF'er (retired jersey)
 
Reveryroadie's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 11,971
Reputation: 2646
Reveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond repute
My Mood:

: $84244
Send a message via Yahoo to Reveryroadie
Default Military to open combat jobs to women

Military to open combat jobs to women

By Chris Lawrence, with reporting from Barbara Starr

The U.S. military is ending its policy of excluding women from combat and will open combat jobs and direct combat units to female troops, CNN has learned. Multiple officials confirm to CNN that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta will make the announcement tomorrow and notify Congress of the planned change in policy.

“We will eliminate the policy of ‘no women in units that are tasked with direct combat,’” a senior defense official says.

But the officials caution that “not every position will open all at once on Thursday.” Once the policy is changed, the Department of Defense will enter what is being called an “assessment phase,” in which each branch of service will examine all of its jobs and units not currently integrated and then produce a timetable in which it can integrate them.

The Army and Marine Corps, especially, will be examining physical standards and gender-neutral accommodations within combat units. Every 90 days, the service chiefs will have to report back on their progress.

The move will be one of the last significant policy decisions made by Panetta, who is expected to leave in mid-February. It is not clear where former Sen. Chuck Hagel, the nominated replacement, stands, but officials say he has been apprised of Panetta's coming announcement.

“It will take awhile to work out the mechanics in some cases. We expect some jobs to open quickly, by the end of this year. Others, like Special Operations Forces and Infantry, may take longer,” a senior defense official explains. Panetta is setting the goal of January 2016 for all assessments to be complete and women integrated as much as possible.

The Pentagon has left itself some wiggle room, however, which may ultimately lead to some jobs being designated as “closed” to women. A senior Defense official says if, after the assessment, a branch finds that “a specific job or unit should not be open, they can go back to the secretary and ask for an exemption to the policy, to designate the job or unit as closed.”

The official says the goal remains to open as many as possible. “We should open all specialties to the maximum extent possible to women. We know they can do it.”

The Pentagon must notify Congress of each job or unit as it is sent up to the secretary to be “opened” to women. And then the Defense Department must wait 30 days while Congress is in session before implementing the change.

It is a marked difference from the way the military ended the exclusion of gays serving openly, or “don’t ask don’t tell.” In that case, there were no stipulations attached to openly gay service members. There was no staggered approach that integrated openly gay troops into units. It was instead done all at once, across the board.

A senior Defense official explained the Pentagon’s reasoning behind the different approach: “You’re talking about personal choice of behavior vs. physical capability. And they were already in the units. If you take a unit that’s never had women before, that’s quite a culture change.”

Another senior Defense official says the goal is “to provide a level, gender-neutral playing field.”

The American Civil Liberties Union recently filed a federal lawsuit against the Department of Defense, charging that combat exclusion is unfair and outdated, harms America’s safety and prevents women from getting training and recognition for their work. The plaintiffs, who include women awarded Purple Hearts, say the exclusion places them at a disadvantage for promotion.

Earlier this month, the Army opened the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment to women, and it has begun recruiting female pilots and crew chiefs. The Navy has put its first female officers on submarines in the past year, and certain female ground troops have been “attached” to combat units in Iraq and Afghanistan. More than 800 women were wounded in those wars, and at least 130 have died.
__________________









Reveryroadie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 06:02 PM   #2
SoonerChuck
Senior Member
All Pro
 
SoonerChuck's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 7,266
Reputation: 2626
SoonerChuck has a reputation beyond reputeSoonerChuck has a reputation beyond reputeSoonerChuck has a reputation beyond reputeSoonerChuck has a reputation beyond reputeSoonerChuck has a reputation beyond reputeSoonerChuck has a reputation beyond reputeSoonerChuck has a reputation beyond reputeSoonerChuck has a reputation beyond reputeSoonerChuck has a reputation beyond reputeSoonerChuck has a reputation beyond reputeSoonerChuck has a reputation beyond repute
My Mood:

: $63520
Default

I'm curious what our military/veteran members think about this issue?
__________________

SoonerChuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 06:23 PM   #3
Titans4Vols
Beast Mode
All Pro
 
Titans4Vols's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,513
Reputation: 2438
Titans4Vols has a reputation beyond reputeTitans4Vols has a reputation beyond reputeTitans4Vols has a reputation beyond reputeTitans4Vols has a reputation beyond reputeTitans4Vols has a reputation beyond reputeTitans4Vols has a reputation beyond reputeTitans4Vols has a reputation beyond reputeTitans4Vols has a reputation beyond reputeTitans4Vols has a reputation beyond reputeTitans4Vols has a reputation beyond reputeTitans4Vols has a reputation beyond repute
: $46626
Default

So long as they can meet the same physical requirements as the men, I have no issue with it myself.
Titans4Vols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 06:24 PM   #4
SOS4Prez
HEY, language.
HOF'er (retired jersey)
 
SOS4Prez's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 11,071
Reputation: 3583
SOS4Prez has a reputation beyond reputeSOS4Prez has a reputation beyond reputeSOS4Prez has a reputation beyond reputeSOS4Prez has a reputation beyond reputeSOS4Prez has a reputation beyond reputeSOS4Prez has a reputation beyond reputeSOS4Prez has a reputation beyond reputeSOS4Prez has a reputation beyond reputeSOS4Prez has a reputation beyond reputeSOS4Prez has a reputation beyond reputeSOS4Prez has a reputation beyond repute
My Mood:

: $37088
Send a message via AIM to SOS4Prez Send a message via Yahoo to SOS4Prez
Default

If they really want to "provide a level, gender-neutral playing field" maybe they should take the issue of women (and men) getting raped in the military more serious and not pussyfoot around it or make excuses. That's the real gender-based issue.
__________________
"We can be all poetic and just lose our minds together."
SOS4Prez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 07:00 PM   #5
Reveryroadie
Roadie/NFL Swami/Co-Owner
HOF'er (retired jersey)
 
Reveryroadie's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 11,971
Reputation: 2646
Reveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond repute
My Mood:

: $84244
Send a message via Yahoo to Reveryroadie
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoonerChuck View Post
I'm curious what our military/veteran members think about this issue?
As a Veteran, I have no problem with it. Some of the best Gunners Mates/Weapons types I ever worked with were Female. but i am sure the howls of discomfort about it will be long and loud.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SOS4Prez View Post
If they really want to "provide a level, gender-neutral playing field" maybe they should take the issue of women (and men) getting raped in the military more serious and not pussyfoot around it or make excuses. That's the real gender-based issue.
Agreed, Rape is something the military has done a piss poor job of dealing with.
__________________









Reveryroadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2013, 08:13 PM   #7
Reveryroadie
Roadie/NFL Swami/Co-Owner
HOF'er (retired jersey)
 
Reveryroadie's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 11,971
Reputation: 2646
Reveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond reputeReveryroadie has a reputation beyond repute
My Mood:

: $84244
Send a message via Yahoo to Reveryroadie
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Mans instincts will make him protect a female almost everytime, unless it s his ex-wife, that puts a mission in jeopardy
Not at all. this actually is not a problem. when your getting shot at, that "instinct" is the last thing on your mind.
__________________









Reveryroadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Support SJ: A percentage of all purchases made at Ebay &/or Amazon
via the search portals below go to support SJ operations.






SJ heartily thanks and recognizes the following monetary contributors...
2013: Jerry, Lee, Reaper, Rondo, Chuck...

2012: Jerry, Lee, Phenomenal TJ,...
2011: Lee, LarryBud, Gavin, SoonerChuck, Rondo, Mike, Jerry
2010: Serrated Shadow
2009: RoatanCharlie, Turbo Turtle, BnGBleeder, BFISA, Mark,
WareWolf94, Fan4ever, Oblong Biscuits, Jerry


Site Theme & Design by LatinMind & Matty

Additional GFX support by bbyao06, Robert, Jimmie, Matty, BoneKrusher, Jeff, & Serrated Shadow



Rate Sports Jabber Forums on these sites


Top NFL Fan SitesBest Football Sites TheSports100.com | Sports Toplist


Ping Blog


Disclaimer
Sports Jabber is not affiliated with the NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, MLS, NCAA, NASCAR, IndyCar, ARCA, NHRA, PGA, USTA, UFC, AFL, IOC,LFL, or any team, organization, or media outlet cited. The purpose of this website is for information, criticism, entertainment and commentary and is protected under the Fair Use Provision of the 1976 Copyright Act. Copyright "Sports Jabber", "SportsJabber.net", "Sports Jabber Forums", "Forums.SportsJabber.net, 2011-2013, All Rights Reserved.


Sports Jabber & all of its units are wholly owned subsidiaries of "D-Squared Enterprises"

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.